Method · wrap-up
Cheat sheet & self-check
9 questions across 3 lessons. Each answer links back to the lesson it came from.
Pick an answer to see if you got it, and why.
Q1. Why include the misleading first signal in an RCA?
Show answer
B. Improving how incidents are investigated is as valuable as fixing the specific bug.
From lesson 01 · The shape of a strong RCAQ2. Why is 'human error' a poor root cause?
Show answer
B. Blameless analysis finds system fixes that prevent the next person making the same mistake.
From lesson 01 · The shape of a strong RCAQ3. Which is the strongest prevention item?
Show answer
B. It's specific, automated, owned, dated, and removes the class of failure rather than relying on memory.
From lesson 01 · The shape of a strong RCAQ4. Why shouldn't the incident commander debug the problem themselves?
Show answer
B. Separate thinking about the system from thinking about the incident.
From lesson 02 · Incident command & communicationQ5. What must every status update contain?
Show answer
B. Predictable updates stop stakeholders interrupting responders for news.
From lesson 02 · Incident command & communicationQ6. Why declare an incident early, even if unsure of severity?
Show answer
B. Most organisations under-declare. Make declaring cheap and normal.
From lesson 02 · Incident command & communicationQ7. Why is a liveness probe that checks the database dangerous?
Show answer
B. Liveness should answer 'is this process stuck?'. Dependency checks belong in readiness (carefully) or nowhere.
From lesson 03 · Architecture antipatternsQ8. The container registry is down. Why might running workloads also fail?
Show answer
B. Registries are a hidden dependency of every restart. Mirrors, caches and digests with IfNotPresent reduce the risk.
From lesson 03 · Architecture antipatternsQ9. What is 'shared fate'?
Show answer
B. Redundancy only helps if failures are independent.
From lesson 03 · Architecture antipatterns